Natrol, Inc. v. Metabolic Response Modifiers, Case No. CV-12-09979 CAS (VBKx) (C.D. Ca. 2012)
Successfully settled trademark infringement case for Metabolic Response Modifiers involving alleged infringement of Natrol, Inc.’s trade dress claimed in its purple label dietary supplements.
Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. American Body Building LLC, Case No. 2006cv60633 (S.D. Fla. 2006)
Represented Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“VPX”) for trade dress infringement of its REDLINE bottle by American Body Building LLC for its SPEED SHOT bottle.
Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Cytosport, Inc., Case No. 2008cv02632 (E.D. Ca. 2008)
Represented VPX for alleged trademark and trade dress infringement of CytoSport’s MUSCLE MILK by VPX’s MUSCLE POWER RTD protein beverage.
Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Monster Energy Company and Reign Beverage Company, LLC, Case No. 2019cv60809 (S.D. Fla. 2019)
Represented VPX for trade dress infringement of the distinctive packaging of the BANG energy drink.
Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.v. Pharmagenx, et al., Case No. 2003cv01370 (S.D. Ca. 2003)
Favorably settled case for VPX against Pharmagenx and Europa for alleged trademark and trade dress infringement of a variety of prohormone products, which resulted in defendants’ cessation of use of trademarks and trade dress.
Vital Pharmaceutical v. Red Bull GMBH, Case No. 2005cv61704 (S.D. Fla. 2005)
Favorably settled case for VPX against Red Bull for alleged infringement of RED BULL for an energy drink by REDLINE for a dietary supplement and energy drink, which allowed VPX’s continued use of REDLINE as a dietary supplement and energy drink.
Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. SAN Nutrition, Case No. 2006cv60646 (S.D. Fla. 2006)
Successfully obtained motion to enforce settlement and attorney’s fees granted in a case related to alleged trade dress infringement of REDLINE trade dress, which resulted in victory for VPX.